Starhawk Beta Review – Why Starhawk is great, and why you might want to wait

Published May 19, 2012 | By Anthony A. Jackson, Jr.

Why Starhawk is great, and why you might want to wait

May. 17th, 2012 – by Jamie Feltham

Not that Starhawk invites food-based metaphors, but it’s a game that has all the right ingredients for an utterly delicious recipe. The problem with this type of title, though, is that it needs some 32 chefs to cook it all to perfection.

And on those occasions, where you don’t burn the potatoes or drop the eggs (last one, I swear), Starhawk is a tasty treat. It’s a dream toy box of an online game, letting you commandeer transforming mechs, jetpacks and shamelessly Halo-esque buggies in third-person games not far off the likes of Star Wars: Battlefront. It can create a heart-pounding flow of master plans, overcoming odds and desperate escapes that many single-player games strive to recreate by leading you down a path on a tight leash.

But there are also the other kinds of occasions, where everyone ‘does their own thing’. Matches seemingly start with a time bomb in each team’s camp as everyone speeds off on the word go with no real plan of attack. A little bit of unbalancing on the game’s build n’ battle feature can lead to some of the most frustrating camping seen on PS3. Oh, and there’s nothing worse than the guy who drives off in the Razorback you just bought without a gunner.

Fortunately, you’ll quite often find that matches play out like the first of these two options (which I would stake is largely thanks to the community from the game’s predecessor, Warhawk), at least enough to warrant coming back for more.

Build n’ battle is what separates Starhawk from the pack – an RTS-inspired feature that lets players build bases to their liking. You might supply an army of turrets to guard the entrance, or build plenty of vehicle depots to keep the team supplied with firepower. Strangely, game modes don’t necessarily cater to this new style of play, instead leaning on old classics like Team Deathmatch and Capture the Flag. It’s a shame that the opportunity for more unique modes has been cast aside, but the likes of CTF are given a fresh twist when allowing you to defend your flag as you see fit.

At the worst of times, the feature will go against the games you’re playing, allowing for camping right outside a base that completely kills any flow the match might have. It’s also a little too hectic and unfocused, allowing any team mate to place any structure anywhere within the base. Without any kind of communication between teammates you can pretty much kiss the strategic importance of BnB goodbye.

Starhawk still holds its own despite these issues, largely thanks to the rock-solid foundations it’s been built upon. The build n’ battle feature is completely dwarfed by the sheer thrill of climbing into a hawk, leaping into the air and transforming Starscream-style before jetting off.

It also doesn’t hurt that it enters the competitive online scene with some well-earned cred, again largely thanks to the original PS3 debut from 2007. Warhawk wasn’t the be all of multiplayer, but it was feature-rich and heavily supported with both free and premium content post-release. It’s encouraging to know that, while developer Light Box might not be quite the same, the game is in good hands and worth committing to.

But while all of this gels together to form a compelling multiplayer package, the single-player component is sorely disappointing. It’s more developed than your average ‘multiplayer tutorial’ seen in past Unreal Tournaments and the like, but it still completely falls short of expectations, simply playing out on online maps and offering little more than telling you where the enemy is going to be next and asking you to kill them. Hawk sections are a frightful bore as you endlessly shift and twist to lock onto enemies, and the game’s intriguing lore is wasted on poorly-presented motion comics that disconnect you from the story and its characters. There’s a lot of potential in Starhawk’s fantastic sci-fi wild west setting, which depicts a warped oil rush for the space age, but it goes nowhere here.

Then again, you don’t see Dead Space 2 getting knocked for its terrible online offerings; why should a multiplayer-focused game get marks off for a boring single-player?

Besides; there’s an entertaining if simplistic co-op offering to make up for those shortcomings. The BnB system is at its most useful here, as you defend a structure with a friend, but it’s still an obvious afterthought. It helps greatly that two players and tackle it in split-screen mode. In fact the whole game is open for a second local player, which Light Box should most definitely be commended for….More at Why Starhawk is great, and why you might want to wait

Starhawk was revealed last May. Having been a Warhawk owner and fan on Playstation 3, this quickly jumped on my radar as a must get, as I tend to be a sucker for most things futuristic. Enjoying a modern shooter like Warhawk and then being presented with its predecessor set in the future?…More at Starhawk Review

Starhawk is a Third-Person Shooter with RTS gameplay elements and an Old Western feel, released in 2012 exclusively for play on PlayStation 3. In it players traverse an energy-hungry gameworld as a gun-for-hire, always impacted by the fact that the only resource that can save humanity also is tainted with the capacity to physically mutate individuals. Game features include: an engrossing single player campaign and a complicated hero character, the ability to alter the battlefield and call for vehicles and airstrikes, land and air vehicles, online community features, and co-op and large-scale online multiplayer support.

photos and videos

Published May 21, 2012 | By Anthony A. Jackson, Jr.

A few nice god of war movie 2012 images I found:

photos and videos
god of war movie 2012
Image by 350.org
I am sending photos and videos I created to fight for Earth. Can you use them in any way?
They are a part of this month Global Community Newsletter. On every Newsletter you will find more photos and videos. You are welcome to use them.

Germain Dufour
Spiritual Leader of the Global Community
Nanaimo
British Columbia
Canada

Note
My address is at the bottom of each webpage I created.
globalcommunitywebnet.com/

Canadian tar sands oil a living insanity

Volume 10 Issue 5 May 2012
globalcommunitywebnet.com/Village/Dialogue2012/Newsletter…
Politics and Justice without borders
Global Community
Global Movement to Help

Theme this month:
Canadian tar sands oil a living insanity

Canadian tar sands oil a living insanity: click on the following file to open all animations and game of this monthly Newsletter.

The list and links of all of our videos so far are found here.
The list and links of all of our video games so far are found here.

Dear reader,

May 26 of each year is a very special day.
Global Community celebrates

1. Life Day,
2. Global Disarmament Day and,
3. Global Peace Movement.

For these reasons I have created the following animations. Let us all celebrate the events.

Tar Sands Oil videos

1) Canadian tar sands oil

a) swf file
b) html file
c) mp4 file

2) Soullife message to life

a) html file
b) mp4 file
c) swf file

3) Stop emissions from tar sands

a) swf file
b) html file
c) mp4 file

4) Game: use your keyboard arrow keys and mouse to uncover Soullife message

a) swf file
b) html file

Game: Uncover Soullife message.

Use your keyboard arrow keys and mouse to uncover the message.

President Obama
A) Thank you letter to President Obama concerning your decision not allowing the world dirtiest oil, tar sands oil from Alberta, to enter on American soil.
a) Animation movie in (.swf)
b) Animation movie in (.wmv)
c) Canadian tar sands oil a living insanity.
B) Letter to President Barack Obama concerning your re-election as President of the United States of America

See the following artboards of
"Thank you letter to President Obama concerning your decision not allowing the world dirtiest oil, tar sands oil from Alberta, to enter on American soil".

Artboard #1 Artboard #2 Artboard #3 Artboard #4 Artboard #5 Artboard #6

Text found in this month theme tar sands oil animations.

Something very odd happened in the world over the past few years!

This is concerning Global Warming and yes, the Kyoto Protocol and subsequent events we see happening today.

The Kyoto Protocol is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC or FCCC), aimed at fighting global warming. The UNFCCC is an international environmental treaty with the goal of achieving the "stabilisation of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. The Protocol was initially adopted on 11 December 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, and entered into force on 16 February 2005. As of September 2011, 191 states have signed and ratified the protocol. The only remaining signatory not to have ratified theprotocol is the United States. Other United Nations member states which did not ratify the protocol are Afghanistan, Andorra and South Sudan. In December 2011, Canada renounced the Protocol.

What is very odd about this?

For many years the USA has refused to sign in the Protocol because they say if China does not do anything to reduce its emissions than we will not do it either.

They said at the time that China would become "the biggest emitter of greenhouse gases". Perhaps we should qualify here those in the USA who truly believe that not doing anything positive to protect the planet and its living inhabitants is the right thing to do. They are the people who believe Republican values are best for the world. The Republican Party and its membership have consistently refused to sign in the Protocol because of that reason. It is like saying if you are bad than I can be as bad as you are. If you are not responsible people why should we!

But China has taken responsibility by manufacturing wind turbines for the world and cars that are completely pollution free.

You would think the USA would react positively and invest in a big way into environmentally friendly projects but think again. Not only does the USA not doing what is right but they are investing in getting tar sands oil by pipeline from Alberta (Canada) to the USA. Although the TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline project has been put temporarily on the back burner, it is only a matter of time before the dirty tar sands oil makes its to the USA.

Republicans in the US are not the only people with their mind set at destroying the planet and polluting all life on Earth. Conservatives in Canada are at least as bad if not much worst people. Prime Minister of Canada and leader of the Conservative Party, Stephen Harper, gets to be crown as the biggest fighter for keeping the tar sands oil flowing to wherever it can, especially into the USA and, oddly enough, to China.

A short time ago the PM made a special trip to China to sell its dirty tar sands oil to the Chinese people so they can use the oil for manufacturing more products to be sold back to the Canadians. The dirty tar sands oil is a very special kind of heavy oil which can also be used to manufacture products for the Chinese war industry. The Canadian manufacturing industry is being gradually dismantled by the Conservatives here in Canada. So we are better stay good friends with China. It is like giving North Korea or Iran a blue print to make nuclear weapons and actually supplying them with fissile fuel materials for nuclear weapons such as uranium-235 and plutonium-239.

Republican and Conservative values are the same. Money! Money is all that counts! Dont use your brain for anything else just sell the resources and get pay. If that blows up the world it is the world fault they say .

So much for future generations! Well, if we let Republicans and Conservatives have their way, they will not have a future!

What is odd about all this? I am coming to that!

For many years Republicans and Conservatives were saying why should we sign in the Kyoto Protocol when China is not committed to reduce its emissions. But now both the USA and Canada are going out of their ways to use the tar sands oil. Canada is letting a Chinese corporation in Canada to build a pipeline to carry the dirty oil to the Canadian West Coast and from there ship it to China. It is like selling and carrying the pollution to China. Whether greenhouse gas emissions are emitted in Canada or in China is no longer relevant. My guess is that the PM of Canada wants to make sure China can be truly called the biggest polluter on the planet. But no! It is truly all about money!

Germain Dufour
Spiritual Leader of the Global Community
May 1st, 2012

References

1.. Impact of human activity on global climate, agriculture, wealth, health, security and all life on Earth
2.. Climate change prelude
3.. Climate change: responsibility and accountability of cities (Part I)
4.. Authors of research papers and articles on issues of Earth management:
A) energy worlwide and,
B) concerns about the protection of the global life-support systems

This is what happens when leaders are not true leaders but selfish opportunists.

The 1% of the people gets much wealthier, safe and secure by mercenaries and governments they subsidize.

The other 99% of the people lose their jobs, suffer poverty and misery.

The tar sands oil is produced, transported across land and oceans, processed, and its by-products used to fabricate war products for more destruction around the world, and thus more dirty oil is needed to reconstruct communities and, once more, destruction occurs. It is an ever lasting cycle of violence, destruction, pollution, war and civil unrests. All of that because the CEOs of oil and gas corporations and their sharholders want more money and power over the 99% of the people.

And when all the dirty oil is used up, our atmosphere, the air we breathe, our oceans and soils, and the ecology of our planet, Earth, will be gone forever.

This will happen this century, soon.

And here what will happen to the air after all the tar sands oil has been used up:

chaos.

This is what we observe in the air above today. Greenhouse gases alone are as high as 390 parts per million.

If we continue to allow further tar sands oil development and production in Alberta, the following chemical emissions will continue to increase beyond repairs.

Those gas emissions from the tar sands oil eventually reach the global stage and pollute all life on the planet. Emissions affect every person on Earth.

Global warming is very real and already causing terrible disasters worldwide.

Parts per million in 2012: 390 ppm

Global warming is causing devastating climate change happening right now:

rising sea levels, droughts, floods, heat waves, forest fires, species extinction.

Parts per million after all Tar Sands oil has been used: 600 ppm

which would mean the end of civilization and of most life species on Earth.

Stop tar sands oil development.

Save the coming generations, the Global Community.

I am Soullife, God’s Spirit.

What will happen when all the tar sands oil has been used up?

What will happen?
All life species on the planet will be dangerously affected and most will be extinct, including all civilizations.

Tar sands oil will make life species extinct along with most civilizations on the planet.

What will the planet be whitout civilizations?

Make life on the planet a good place to be.

Life is not a rose garden but it can be good for everyone.

Life over the entire Universe is my message to you.

Life is my way to communicate with you, and you with me.

Life is the global common amongst all galaxies.

What have you done to life on the planet?

What have you done to your civilizations?

What will you do to make things better?

Make Global Community values your values. Fear not!

Authors of research papers and articles on issues of Earth management:

A) energy worlwide and,
B) concerns about the protection of the global life-support systems